
|
|
Each month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provides all
education grantees with a brief on-line newsletter. The newsletter
offers research summaries, best practices and profiles, and
technical assistance on a specific topic related to school reform
and restructuring. Feel free to share this newsletter, and its
resources, but please note that the foundation cannot ensure its
accuracy once it has been forwarded, altered or excerpted.
Please let us know if this newsletter is useful to you and how it
might be improved to better serve your needs. Comments and
suggestions can be sent to Carol Rava at carolr@gatesfoundation.org.
Breaking Up Large High Schools
To undertake the challenge of breaking up large high schools is
to confront 50 years of intractability in the American education
system. The barriers to change, including district policy, state law
and higher education admission standards, are great, but the need
for change is critical. The statistics reveal the failure of
American high schools today. High school graduation rates hover at
75 percent, and the rate is closer to 50 percent for low-income and
minority students.
Yet in select communities across the country, schools and
districts are tackling the issue of high school redesign and seeking
to create small schools that will help their young people succeed,
despite the many challenges, the limited research and resources, and
a path that is decidedly less traveled.
Those who have begun the work in their districts and schools can
serve as tremendous resources for others throughout the country by
providing insight, anticipating challenges, and sharing inspiring
stories. We hope the information and stories contained here help to
connect schools engaged in this difficult work of transforming large
schools.
|
| RESEARCH SUMMARIES |
Breaking
up large high schools: Five common (and understandable) errors of
execution. -- Tom Gregory, 2001. ERIC Digest. ERIC
Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
This digest reviews recent research on breaking up large,
impersonal high schools and discusses five common errors made in
downsizing attempts: errors of autonomy, size, continuity, time, and
control. The author also recommends several technical assistance
resources to help reformers avoid the errors described.
Wall
to wall: Implementing small learning communities in five Boston high
schools. -- Lili Allen with Cheryl Almeida and Adria
Steinberg, 2001. Jobs for the Future and the Education
Alliance/Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at
Brown University.
This paper looks at the experiences of five large, impersonal
high schools in Boston as they restructure into smaller learning
communities. Three years into a district-wide reform effort, the
schools provide insight into the opportunities, tensions and
challenges faced by large urban high schools as they undertake whole
school reform. The authors discuss key findings from the five
schools and their implications for reform in other school districts.
|
| BEST
PRACTICES AND PROFILES |
Best Practice #1
- Mountlake
Terrace High School
Based upon research demonstrating the benefits of small schools,
Mountlake Terrace High School in suburban Seattle, Washington,
decided to break up its large, 1,900-student high school into small,
autonomous schools. School staff began the work in October 2000 with
a planning grant from the U.S. Department of Education. The school
formed a steering committee to begin the process of designing the
new schools. The committee then conducted focus groups with
students, community members, parents, faculty, and staff to ensure
that all members of the school community were involved in the
process.
Currently, staff are writing and submitting school design
proposals to the steering committee. The proposals specify the
number of small schools to be created and identify the mission,
focus and overall design for each. Through additional focus groups,
the school community will have the opportunity to comment on each of
the proposals. By the end of the school year, Mountlake Terrace
expects to select final proposals. During the 2002-2003 school year,
staff assigned to each of the new schools will work together to
finalize the design plan. Mountlake Terrace's small high schools are
scheduled to open in the fall of 2003. For more information, please
contact Gwendine Norton at nortong@edmonds.wednet.edu
or 425-670-7776.
Best Practice #2 - Julia Richman
Education Complex
In 1993, Julia Richman closed to entering freshmen so the work to
convert the large, impersonal high school to small schools could
begin. Located in Manhattan, the district was large enough to house
the students in other schools for the two years it took to
reconfigure the building. During this time students could attend one
of a handful of small schools located outside the school building.
In 1995, these schools moved into what is now known as the Julia
Richman Education Complex.
Today, the complex houses approximately 1,650 students in six
small schools. There are four high schools: Urban Academy; Talent
Unlimited, a performing arts school; Manhattan International High
School, which serves new immigrants; and Vanguard High. A K-8 school
and a middle school for autistic students completes the group.
The schools are autonomous, each having its own budget, teachers,
schedules, and curriculum. While each school has its own separate
space within the complex, the schools share a number of common
facilities, which include a library, cafeteria, auditorium, ceramics
studio, culinary arts room, dance studio, mini theater, art gallery,
swimming pool and gymnasiums.
For more information, contact Ann Cook, co-director of the
Urban Academy, who is responsible for coordinating visits to the
Julia Richman Complex. She can be reached at 212-570-5394 or via
email at ann_cook@cce.org.
|
| TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE |
The
Small Schools Project
Center on Reinventing Public Education at the University of
WashingtonThe Small Schools Project provides research, resources,
tools, and guidance for schools and districts beginning the process
of breaking up large schools into small, autonomous schools. The Web
site also provides a network for school and community leaders to
share information.
The National
Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching
Teachers College, Columbia University
The National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and
Teaching supports restructuring efforts by documenting successful
initiatives, creating reform networks to share new research findings
with practitioners, and linking policy to practice.
The Small
Schools Workshop
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Small Schools Workshop runs conferences and workshops and
maintains a Web site rich in resources.
| |